Skip to main content

Stone Mountain Half a Reminder of Institutionalized Racism

By Robert Grand 

Great art is timeless, but also inevitably tied to the time in which it was produced. Many coins are miniature works of art and as such, reveal the ideals and prejudices of the time in which they were minted.

Today, as we struggle with issues of social justice, and particularly as we examine the role of civil war monuments and what they signify to Black Americans (indeed all Americans), it may be instructive to examine a coin issued in 1925 known as the Stone Mountain commemorative half dollar.

On the obverse (heads), the coin depicts Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee on horseback. On the reverse (tails), there is an eagle and the words “Dedicated to the valor of the Confederate soldier.” The money raised from the sale of the coin was to be used to finance carving the figures portrayed on the coin on the side of Stone Mountain in Georgia near Atlanta.

The project quickly became controversial. Besides the financial irregularities that occurred in the sales of the coins, there was the fact that the coin was promoted to Congress as being not only a memorial to Confederate bravery but also as a memorial to President Harding, who had recently died. This made the proposed coin more palatable to Northern congressmen, and thus the coin was authorized. (The reverse design was later altered by order of then-President Coolidge, and no mention of Harding was on the coin as issued.)

The artist of the coin was Gutzon Berglum. He was hired to sculpt the figures of Jackson and Lee on Stone Mountain. Mr. Berglum, however, was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and espoused “Nordic Superiority.” He was clearly a racist and was ultimately fired from the monument project, which was finally completed in 1964. He was later hired to sculpt Mt. Rushmore!

The coin reflects the times, and it is a reminder of just how institutionalized racism was in 1925. The question is, in our hearts, where are we today?

 

This “Viewpoint” was written by Robert Grand, a collector from Springfield, Mo.

To have your opinion considered for Viewpoint, send an email to numismatics@aimmedia.com. Please include your first and last name, city, and state.

Read more Viewpoint articles. 

 

 

 

The post Stone Mountain Half a Reminder of Institutionalized Racism appeared first on Numismatic News.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gold goes digital: Dillon Gage introduces DGGold future of direct physical gold ownership, now available to investors

Addison, Texas (August 15, 2018) —  Dillon Gage Metals , one of the world’s largest precious metals wholesale firms and technology innovators in the industry, recently launched its first Digital Metals product: DGGold. This product is the first of its kind to be offered to the retail public through Dillon Gage’s growing precious metals dealer network. It is eligible for purchase on their proprietary online trading platform, FizTrade. DGGold, which utilizes VaultChain Gold powered by Tradewind, delivers an unprecedented method of direct gold ownership to the investment community, expanding on Dillon Gage’s already impressive lineup of product and service offerings. “I am excited to introduce Dillon Gage Metals’ newest product to the individual investor and individual retirement account investment community,” said Mark Furmanek, chief operating officer at Dillon Gage Metals. “DGGold brings an investment product, previously dominated by large institutions and bullion banks...

Royal Mint Partners with NGC to Offer Certified UK Coins

The Royal Mint, the official mint of the United Kingdom, has partnered with Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC), the world's largest third-party coin grading service. For the first time, The Royal... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

Letters to the Editor: Nov. 12, 2019

War in the Pacific ‘W’ Mintmark I was in the self-checkout at Walmart four weeks ago here in Mt. Vernon, Ill., and received a little bit of loose change for my purchase. I didn’t check it until I got home and was very surprised to find a War in the Pacific with a “W” mintmark. I’m just wondering if it’s something that I should send in to one of the grading companies. In other words, would it be worth more later on by doing so? I understand that it’ll cost at least   $30.00 to do so and also heard that “in the raw” is only worth maybe $25. I   hope to hear a reply. Name and address withheld   In Response to Richard Giedroyc’s Commentary I politely disagree with erudite and longtime numismatic colleague, Richard Giedroyc, whose Numismatic News story, “Get Rich” Promotion Wrong Angle for Healthy Market Growth,” was critical of a recent CNBC story entitled, “People have been making up to $100,000 off ‘coin hunting.’” He doesn’t think the hobby will benefit with an a...