Skip to main content

Viewpoint: Hobby offers educational experiences

A seemingly rare 1943-P “copper” Lincoln cent disappointingly turned out to be a counterfeit.

by Sam Lukes

The March 19 issue of Numismatic News featured “Another rare 1943 ‘copper’ cent slabbed,” which followed on the heels of a Feb. 5 article in reference to the legendary Don Lutes Jr. specimen that sold at auction for $204,000.

Earlier this year, an individual from out of state contacted me and stated he had a circulated 1943-P Lincoln Head cent, which, when applied to a very strong magnet, the coin did not stick. So far, so good, as the “magnet test” confirmed it was not struck from a common zinc-coated steel alloy cent that had been copper-plated as many are.

I then instructed him to e-mail me photo images of the coin’s obverse and reverse, and to also weigh the coin. He shortly complied, and the weight of the cent registered 3.19 grams (heavier than the normal issue of 3.11 grams). I suggested the coin might have been struck on a foreign planchet, which would have to be determined.

The photo images met all of the criteria for a genuine 1943 cent. The all-important numeral “3” was correctly shaped (extended lower serif), and the entire date was evenly spaced. I compared it to my photo files of a PCGS MS-61 RB example I had sold nearly 20 years prior, and every aspect of the coin appeared to be legitimate. Subsequently, we arranged for the coin to be shipped to me so I could extensively view and scrutinize it.

Once the coin arrived, I also weighed it (indeed, 3.19 grams), and placed it under my stereo microscope, utilizing direct and indirect lighting. There were no visible signs of retooling or alteration of the “3,” which verified that its source was not from copper cents struck in 1948 or 1949 that are commonly used to produce fake 1943 “bronze” cents.

I meticulously checked the edges of the coin to see if it might be a cleverly produced electrotype that had been expertly buffed in order to conceal a telltale seam. No such evidence was displayed. I further determined that the coin was not manufactured using a spark erosion technique.

While viewing the reverse of the coin, alas, a red flag shot up! There were myriad microscopic surface granulations beginning near the “E” of “CENT,” then meandering downward between the “T” and “E” of “UNITED,” which increased prominently beneath “AMERICA,” an indication of possible foul play.

My immediate thought was that there was a good chance the coin could be a clever Chinese concoction, produced on a copper flan! Thus, the next step was to submit the coin to the Professional Coin Grading Service for their professional expertise to determine its authenticity.

Numerically, I felt the coin would grade at least EF-40 if determined to be genuine. I confided in my client that I had my doubts because of the weight of the coin and the suspect areas exhibited on its reverse, but off it went, and he kept his fingers anxiously crossed.

Within a few weeks of guarded, speculative hope and anticipation, the coin was shipped back, the verdict was in, and PCGS had determined it to be counterfiet. Out of curiosity, I contacted PCGS and inquired whether the piece was a foreign or domestic forgery. Try as I might, I was not given privy to that information, which was a bit disappointing. My personal opinion is that the coin was of Chinese origin.

Herein this wonderful hobby/industry, information is supposedly highly regarded and touted. Collectors and dealers alike (be they novice or seasoned veterans) need to be numismatically educated, especially when it comes to key date rarities such as a 1943 “bronze” cent. I felt most sorry for my client, whose proverbial dreams of fame and fortune were abruptly shattered.

But who knows? There is always a chance for a possible dream coin yet to be discovered, which makes engaging in numismatics so enjoyable, entertaining, and exciting!

This “Viewpoint” was written by Sam Lukes, a dealer from Visalia, Calif.

To have your opinion considered for Viewpoint, write to Editor, Numismatic News, 5225 Joerns Drive, Stevens Point WI, 54481. Email submissions can be sent to numismatics@fwmedia.com.

 

This article was originally printed in Numismatic News. >> Subscribe today.

 


 TITLE
If you like what you’ve read here, we invite you to visit our online bookstore to learn more about Strike It Rich With Pocket Change.

Learn more >>>


The post Viewpoint: Hobby offers educational experiences appeared first on Numismatic News.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gold goes digital: Dillon Gage introduces DGGold future of direct physical gold ownership, now available to investors

Addison, Texas (August 15, 2018) —  Dillon Gage Metals , one of the world’s largest precious metals wholesale firms and technology innovators in the industry, recently launched its first Digital Metals product: DGGold. This product is the first of its kind to be offered to the retail public through Dillon Gage’s growing precious metals dealer network. It is eligible for purchase on their proprietary online trading platform, FizTrade. DGGold, which utilizes VaultChain Gold powered by Tradewind, delivers an unprecedented method of direct gold ownership to the investment community, expanding on Dillon Gage’s already impressive lineup of product and service offerings. “I am excited to introduce Dillon Gage Metals’ newest product to the individual investor and individual retirement account investment community,” said Mark Furmanek, chief operating officer at Dillon Gage Metals. “DGGold brings an investment product, previously dominated by large institutions and bullion banks...

Royal Mint Partners with NGC to Offer Certified UK Coins

The Royal Mint, the official mint of the United Kingdom, has partnered with Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC), the world's largest third-party coin grading service. For the first time, The Royal... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

Letters to the Editor: Nov. 12, 2019

War in the Pacific ‘W’ Mintmark I was in the self-checkout at Walmart four weeks ago here in Mt. Vernon, Ill., and received a little bit of loose change for my purchase. I didn’t check it until I got home and was very surprised to find a War in the Pacific with a “W” mintmark. I’m just wondering if it’s something that I should send in to one of the grading companies. In other words, would it be worth more later on by doing so? I understand that it’ll cost at least   $30.00 to do so and also heard that “in the raw” is only worth maybe $25. I   hope to hear a reply. Name and address withheld   In Response to Richard Giedroyc’s Commentary I politely disagree with erudite and longtime numismatic colleague, Richard Giedroyc, whose Numismatic News story, “Get Rich” Promotion Wrong Angle for Healthy Market Growth,” was critical of a recent CNBC story entitled, “People have been making up to $100,000 off ‘coin hunting.’” He doesn’t think the hobby will benefit with an a...