Skip to main content

Viewpoint: Grading system needs linear steps

By Paul Richards

Years ago, I was an active shirt-pocket coin dealer, and I wrote an article about the grading services and about the 70-point coin grading scale.

The original article was published by Coin World, and its subsequent criticism caused me to drop the subject completely. Now, 15 years later, it may be time to dredge it up again!

The article proposes a new “linear” 32-point grading scale in contrast to today’s “non-linear” 70-point scale. Below are a few excerpts from the article, modified slightly, which introduce an idea called “one discernible step in grade.”

From its inception, today’s 70-point numismatic grading system attempts to link numismatic grade to numismatic value. In his original work, Dr. Sheldon asserts that an XF40 coin carries approximately 10 times the value of a G4 coin. That is, if a G4 coin costs about $1, an XF40 coin should cost about $40.

The desire to couple grade and value in one numeric system causes non-linearity in that system.

Enthusiasts at Early American Coppers (those fusspots!) can discern a technical grading difference between Good 4 and Good 5. Similarly, many careful numismatists can detect subtle differences within the Very Fine range of grades, from VF20 to VF25, for example.

In the first case, one discernible step in grade represents one numeric point from G4 to G5. In the second case, one discernible step represents five numeric points from VF20 to VF25. The point discrepancy between these two cases is known as non-linearity.

To give another example, moving from MS63 to MS64 represents one discernible grade step for Mint State coins. But for AU coins, moving from AU55 to AU58 – three numeric points – represents one discernible grade step.

The focus of the article was about comparing one grading service with another, but you cannot do that using a non-linear grading scale. My proposed 32-point linear grading scale, shown in Figure 4 of the article, attempted to solve the problem.

Since 2003, I have retired and shifted my numismatic endeavors to a website called CoinQuest.com. Today, I read only one numismatic periodical: yours!

Please consider my work on a 32-point linear grading scale as you discuss the proposed 100-point scale.

This “Viewpoint” was written by Paul Richards, a hobbyist from West Melbourne, Fla.

To have your opinion considered for Viewpoint, write to David C. Harper, Editor, Numismatic News, 5225 Joerns Drive, Suite 2, Stevens Point WI, 54481. Send email to david.harper@fwmedia.com.

 

This article was originally printed in Numismatic News. >> Subscribe today.

 


 SCWC 1701-1800
If you like what you’ve read here, we invite you to visit our online bookstore to learn more about Standard Catalog of World Coins, 1701-1800.
 
Learn more >>>

The post Viewpoint: Grading system needs linear steps appeared first on Numismatic News.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Relationship between Spot Price and Future Price?

“What is the Relationship between Spot Price and Future Price?” https://t.co/huMekCRAjs — Gold Eagle Price (@goldeagleprice) March 21, 2019 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js Busted #PreciousMetals Traders Distract From Larger Manipulation Problem https://t.co/N1Mjp8on2F — Gold Eagle Price (@goldeagleprice) March 21, 2019 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js When #Gold Confiscation Is a Personal Choice https://t.co/dMI3EbJ6Dm — Gold Eagle Price (@goldeagleprice) March 21, 2019 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js #Palladium Pandemonium May Portend a #Silver Mania Ahead https://t.co/VRDoVfXUeD — Gold Eagle Price (@goldeagleprice) March 21, 2019 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js from Precious Metals News from Gold Eagle Price – Price of Silver Oz

Limited edition Apollo 13 coins with astronaut autograph

Hover to zoom. PCGS Grades and Certifies Fred Haise Signed Commemorative Coins Kennedy Space Center, Florida (April 4, 2020) — A very limited number of 2019 Apollo gold, silver, and clad commemorative coins have been graded and encapsulated by Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS) with special Apollo 13 50th anniversary inserts, each autographed by Lunar Module Pilot Fred Haise to commemorate his historic mission. Fewer than three hundred of these coins across all denominations have been encapsulated, with populations of some fewer than 20. This new insert, which bears the April 11, 1970, launch date, has been retired and no more will be produced. The coins can be purchased directly from the Astronauts Memorial Foundation website . Coins offered for sale by the Astronauts Memorial Foundation (AMF) come from the official Apollo 50th Anniversary First Day of Issue Coin Launch Ceremony at Kennedy Space Center on January 24th, 2019. Only coins submitted by AMF to PCGS can carry ...

Letters to the Editor (September 18, 2018)

Minting a new 3-cent piece wasteful if not silly Mint a three-cents coin? In the Aug. 28 issue of Numismatic News , a Viewpoint article by Wayne Pearson advocated the issuance of a new three-cent denomination coin to replace the cent. I think this idea is silly since nothing can be bought for three cents. Minting such a denomination would be wasteful. The least expensive item I know of is a paper bag, which one can buy for 10 cents in California when buying groceries. Making any coin of a smaller denomination makes no sense. I advocate a complete reworking of all of our coin denominations as follows: A dime, as the smallest; a quarter; a half dollar; and a dollar and a five dollar, all in ascending order of size. Eliminate the $1 bill and the $5 bill and begin the printing of $500 bills. Thomas Miller Santa Rosa, Calif.   Base metal dollar coin designs that have circulated alongside the paper dollar include Eisenhower (top left), Susan B. Anthony (center right), and Sacaga...