Engraving mistake remained uncorrected

By Peter Huntoon and Doug Murray

While perusing the scans of the proofs on the Smithsonian website, Doug Murray spotted an extraordinary situation. Every Series of 1882 $1,000 gold certificate proof, including the countersigned Fr.1218a variety, utilized a misspelled Thousand in the central banner; specifically, “One Thonsand Dollars.”

This heretofore unrecognized mistake by the numismatic community is an out-and-out engraving error that was created when a letter engraver engraved the banner on a component die, the banner was lifted onto a component roll, and the image transferred onto the master generic full-face dies for both the countersigned and non-countersigned varieties.

Full-face rolls lifted from those masters were used to lay-in the generic faces onto the six 4-subject plates that ultimately were used to print the notes, which remained current for the next 25 years. We find it extraordinary that the mistake never was corrected.

Shown here a subject from the Fr.1218c proof (above) and a detail from the Fr.1218a countersigned proof (below).

This article was originally printed in Bank Note Reporter. >> Subscribe today.

If you like what you’ve read here, we invite you to visit our online bookstore to learn more about Standard Catalog of United States Paper Money.

Learn more >>>

The post Engraving mistake remained uncorrected appeared first on Numismatic News.

Comments

Gold goes digital: Dillon Gage introduces DGGold future of direct physical gold ownership, now available to investors

Addison, Texas (August 15, 2018) — Dillon Gage Metals , one of the world’s largest precious metals wholesale firms and technology innovators in the industry, recently launched its first Digital Metals product: DGGold. This product is the first of its kind to be offered to the retail public through Dillon Gage’s growing precious metals dealer network. It is eligible for purchase on their proprietary online trading platform, FizTrade. DGGold, which utilizes VaultChain Gold powered by Tradewind, delivers an unprecedented method of direct gold ownership to the investment community, expanding on Dillon Gage’s already impressive lineup of product and service offerings. “I am excited to introduce Dillon Gage Metals’ newest product to the individual investor and individual retirement account investment community,” said Mark Furmanek, chief operating officer at Dillon Gage Metals. “DGGold brings an investment product, previously dominated by large institutions and bullion banks...

Royal Mint Partners with NGC to Offer Certified UK Coins

The Royal Mint, the official mint of the United Kingdom, has partnered with Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC), the world's largest third-party coin grading service. For the first time, The Royal... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

Letters to the Editor: Nov. 12, 2019

War in the Pacific ‘W’ Mintmark I was in the self-checkout at Walmart four weeks ago here in Mt. Vernon, Ill., and received a little bit of loose change for my purchase. I didn’t check it until I got home and was very surprised to find a War in the Pacific with a “W” mintmark. I’m just wondering if it’s something that I should send in to one of the grading companies. In other words, would it be worth more later on by doing so? I understand that it’ll cost at least $30.00 to do so and also heard that “in the raw” is only worth maybe $25. I hope to hear a reply. Name and address withheld In Response to Richard Giedroyc’s Commentary I politely disagree with erudite and longtime numismatic colleague, Richard Giedroyc, whose Numismatic News story, “Get Rich” Promotion Wrong Angle for Healthy Market Growth,” was critical of a recent CNBC story entitled, “People have been making up to $100,000 off ‘coin hunting.’” He doesn’t think the hobby will benefit with an a...

Gold Eagle Price

Search This Blog