Skip to main content

Action against counterfeiting sorely needed

Just how bad is the counterfeiting problem in the U.S. coin and bullion industry?

We just don’t know.

That is part of our current problem.

We know it is bad enough that the Industry Council for Tangible Assets created a special task force at the beginning of the year.

We know that David J. Ryder, the nominee to be U.S. Mint director, was asked about it at his Senate confirmation hearing Oct. 24.

We know it is bad enough that two members of Congress wrote a joint letter Oct. 27 to the current head of the U.S. Mint, Acting Principal Deputy Director David Motl, and to Randolf D. Alles, director of the Secret Service.

The questions posed by Rep. Alex X. Mooney and Rep. Frank Lucas in the letter are revealing.

The letter first off says it is accompanying a tungsten fake one-ounce American Eagle gold coin dated 1995.

It notes that the Secret Service is not inclined to investigate such fake American Eagles.

So it asks for information regarding:

“1. The nature and quantity of complaints – and resulting investigations – regarding counterfeit U.S. gold, silver, and platinum coins within the past two years.

“2. Whether, and to what extent, the U.S. Mint has reviewed the anti-counterfeiting measures that have been implemented by other sovereign and private mints – and whether the U.S. Mint is preparing to implement any technologies to protect the integrity of America’s coins minted of gold, silver, and platinum, and palladium.

“3. What anti-counterfeiting programs, if any, are in place to protect the integrity of U.S. coins minted specifically of gold, silver, platinum, and palladium?

“4. The expected roles of the Secret Service, the U.S. Customs and Border Enforcement, and other federal law enforcement agencies in detecting and investigating counterfeits of U.S. coins minted of precious metals and the extent of their coordination with the U.S. Mint.”

These four points show that we are in the very early stages of the process.

I hope answers are forthcoming soon.

I do know that fakes of modern gold bullion coins have been appearing since the 1980s, and the Secret Service’s indifference to them dates to the same time.

Its position was the issuer of these coins is responsible for finding out who is faking their products.

The existence of tungsten-filled gold bars and various fake American Eagles goes back years. Just Google the topic.

The Royal Canadian Mint has changed the way it strikes its gold and silver Maple Leaf bullion coins, and it has created a machine that will tell you whether these recently made pieces with its Bullion DNA are genuine or fake.

The gold Maple Leaf was changed in 2014 and the silver in 2015.

Obviously, Canada is either ahead of the game or it was facing a more serious problem than we know.

The action by ICTA this year shows that there is a level of concern that is demanding industry action in the United States.

It would certainly be helpful if the Secret Service and the U.S. Mint become aggressively active in this area.

Let’s hope the problem of counterfeiting will be defined, quantified and counteracted.

This letter by the two Congressmen is an early step in that direction.

Buzz blogger Dave Harper won the Numismatic Literary Guild Award for Best Blog for the third time in 2017 . He is editor of the weekly newspaper “Numismatic News.”

• Like this blog? Read more by subscribing to Numismatic News.

The post Action against counterfeiting sorely needed appeared first on Numismatic News.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gold goes digital: Dillon Gage introduces DGGold future of direct physical gold ownership, now available to investors

Addison, Texas (August 15, 2018) —  Dillon Gage Metals , one of the world’s largest precious metals wholesale firms and technology innovators in the industry, recently launched its first Digital Metals product: DGGold. This product is the first of its kind to be offered to the retail public through Dillon Gage’s growing precious metals dealer network. It is eligible for purchase on their proprietary online trading platform, FizTrade. DGGold, which utilizes VaultChain Gold powered by Tradewind, delivers an unprecedented method of direct gold ownership to the investment community, expanding on Dillon Gage’s already impressive lineup of product and service offerings. “I am excited to introduce Dillon Gage Metals’ newest product to the individual investor and individual retirement account investment community,” said Mark Furmanek, chief operating officer at Dillon Gage Metals. “DGGold brings an investment product, previously dominated by large institutions and bullion banks...

Royal Mint Partners with NGC to Offer Certified UK Coins

The Royal Mint, the official mint of the United Kingdom, has partnered with Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC), the world's largest third-party coin grading service. For the first time, The Royal... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

Letters to the Editor: Nov. 12, 2019

War in the Pacific ‘W’ Mintmark I was in the self-checkout at Walmart four weeks ago here in Mt. Vernon, Ill., and received a little bit of loose change for my purchase. I didn’t check it until I got home and was very surprised to find a War in the Pacific with a “W” mintmark. I’m just wondering if it’s something that I should send in to one of the grading companies. In other words, would it be worth more later on by doing so? I understand that it’ll cost at least   $30.00 to do so and also heard that “in the raw” is only worth maybe $25. I   hope to hear a reply. Name and address withheld   In Response to Richard Giedroyc’s Commentary I politely disagree with erudite and longtime numismatic colleague, Richard Giedroyc, whose Numismatic News story, “Get Rich” Promotion Wrong Angle for Healthy Market Growth,” was critical of a recent CNBC story entitled, “People have been making up to $100,000 off ‘coin hunting.’” He doesn’t think the hobby will benefit with an a...