Skip to main content

Viewpoint: Grading system needs linear steps

By Paul Richards

Years ago, I was an active shirt-pocket coin dealer, and I wrote an article about the grading services and about the 70-point coin grading scale.

The original article was published by Coin World, and its subsequent criticism caused me to drop the subject completely. Now, 15 years later, it may be time to dredge it up again!

The article proposes a new “linear” 32-point grading scale in contrast to today’s “non-linear” 70-point scale. Below are a few excerpts from the article, modified slightly, which introduce an idea called “one discernible step in grade.”

From its inception, today’s 70-point numismatic grading system attempts to link numismatic grade to numismatic value. In his original work, Dr. Sheldon asserts that an XF40 coin carries approximately 10 times the value of a G4 coin. That is, if a G4 coin costs about $1, an XF40 coin should cost about $40.

The desire to couple grade and value in one numeric system causes non-linearity in that system.

Enthusiasts at Early American Coppers (those fusspots!) can discern a technical grading difference between Good 4 and Good 5. Similarly, many careful numismatists can detect subtle differences within the Very Fine range of grades, from VF20 to VF25, for example.

In the first case, one discernible step in grade represents one numeric point from G4 to G5. In the second case, one discernible step represents five numeric points from VF20 to VF25. The point discrepancy between these two cases is known as non-linearity.

To give another example, moving from MS63 to MS64 represents one discernible grade step for Mint State coins. But for AU coins, moving from AU55 to AU58 – three numeric points – represents one discernible grade step.

The focus of the article was about comparing one grading service with another, but you cannot do that using a non-linear grading scale. My proposed 32-point linear grading scale, shown in Figure 4 of the article, attempted to solve the problem.

Since 2003, I have retired and shifted my numismatic endeavors to a website called CoinQuest.com. Today, I read only one numismatic periodical: yours!

Please consider my work on a 32-point linear grading scale as you discuss the proposed 100-point scale.

This “Viewpoint” was written by Paul Richards, a hobbyist from West Melbourne, Fla.

To have your opinion considered for Viewpoint, write to David C. Harper, Editor, Numismatic News, 5225 Joerns Drive, Suite 2, Stevens Point WI, 54481. Send email to david.harper@fwmedia.com.

 

This article was originally printed in Numismatic News. >> Subscribe today.

 

SCWC 1701-1800
If you like what you’ve read here, we invite you to visit our online bookstore to learn more about Standard Catalog of World Coins, 1701-1800.
 
Learn more >>>

The post Viewpoint: Grading system needs linear steps appeared first on Numismatic News.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Royal Mint Partners with NGC to Offer Certified UK Coins

The Royal Mint, the official mint of the United Kingdom, has partnered with Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC), the world's largest third-party coin grading service. For the first time, The Royal... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]
Post a Comment
Read more

Record High Gold Price?

This week, the price of gold reached an all-time high price against the U.S. dollar. It closed Wednesday this week on the COMEX at $1,953.50 per troy ounce, well above even intraday gold prices during the previous peak in September 2011. Gold had previously set all-time high record prices against almost every other world currency last week. However, this record-high gold price needs to be noted with an asterisk. The reason the asterisk is needed is that the value of the U.S. dollar itself has declined over the years. As a consequence, the price of gold this week, if compared to a U.S. dollar of consistent purchasing power, is lower than the previous peak price in September 2011 of about $1,924 and even further below the January 1980 peak of about $850. To give you some idea of the instability of the value of the U.S. dollar, just compare the M2 definition of the U.S. money supply, courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: January 1980:      ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Community Voice Response: Jan. 1, 2020

From the Dec. 13 Numismatic News E-NewsLetter What are your numismatic resolutions for the new year? Here are some answers sent in from our E-Newsletter readers.   One of my numismatic resolutions is to do what I can to make sure coin collector’s concerns are represented and NOT deep-pocket businesses. Ron Brown Address Withheld   My resolution is to encourage everyone in the world to never again buy from the U.S. Mint, considering the 2019-S Enhanced Reverse Proof fiasco. Steve McGowan Algonac, Mich.   First, I want to pay for the coins I purchased in 2019. Secondly, I want to pre-order my 2020 silver eagles graded. Merry Christmas to all! Timothy Kenyon Mechanicsburg, Pa.   One of my resolutions is not to end up with 20 2020 ASE’s in different holders/OGP/signatures as I did in 2019. Donovan Hamilton Address Withheld   We want to bring the enjoyment of the hobby to as many young people as possible and to keep the future of numismatics brig...
Post a Comment
Read more